Geek For E!

Movie Review: Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy

January.  The notorious dumping ground of films that weren’t good enough to warrant any kind of award recognition the year before, and aren’t groovy enough to be a fun ride for Summer blockbuster season.  I’m not talking about movies that had an “awards release” late in the prior year.  They’re just cheating the system, but I’m all for it if that means the good stuff continues to trickle into the multiplexes for a few extra weeks.

But then there are the wild cards; the movies released for a hiccup in the prior year but have no real business appearing in Best Movie lists.  These are the films that you’re supposed to like if you know what’s good for you.  If you don’t?  Well, guess you’re not in the club.  And guess I’m not in the club when it comes to Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy; as a book it was a striking look at Cold War espionage.  As a movie it just left me cold.

Pity poor retired spies.  Just when they think they can fade away, they get pulled right back in.  Or something.  George Smiley is one of those guys.  He did a lot of bad things for the good of Her Majesty’s Service, and does that service let him relax?  Nooooo.  He’s tapped to figure out who is dropping the dime on covert activities, something that has led to all sorts of permanently bad things happening to people in and around the British Secret Intelligence Service/SIS (the U.K.’s CIA).

So George goes about trying to figure out what’s going on, but everything seems to be just out of reach.  I feel his pain.  As I watched the movie unspool, the groovy mid-20th Century hipness (and godawful clothes — oh how I loved seeing all that plaid and polyester), spooky Spooks and exotic locales all got washed away in a sea of grey, cloudy boredom.  Is there a lot to take in?  Oh you bet.  At 400 pages, John le Carre was able to create a living, breathing sense of paranoia in the book this film is based on.  Here, director Tomas Alfredson relies on a handout given to moviegoers describing the various ins and outs of “The Circus” (the SIS).  Lordy how I hope they give ‘em out during regular showings, because folks are gonna wish for something — anything —  to focus on.

The stars here are like a Who’s Who of British acting powerhouses; Gary Oldman, John Hurt, Ciarán Hinds, the lovely character actor Toby Jones….  But sadly, not even the usual gorgeousness of Colin Firth (as SIS bigwig Bill Haydon) could break through my ever-building sense of ennui.  Pity, since it feels as if these fine actors all gave their best effort.  But as with Shame, simply waving an interesting premise under a moviegoer’s nose isn’t enough.  The audience has to be connected, drawn in, to the goings on, or else it’s a wash.

I wanted to pull Alfredson aside and tell him that even though this is a movie about espionage, the plot doesn’t need to be such a bloody secret.  Remind him that he made the eerie, brilliant Let The Right One In.  Say to him that he’s better than his latest effort.  Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy makes the machinations of thousands of intelligence operatives in the Cold War era look positively dull as dishwater.  All I could think about is how badly I wanted to leave the theater; it takes a special level of suck to get me to that point.  Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy hit it right on the head.

Bret Easton Ellis has been catching some serious flack for his tweets about this movie — my favorite is “I would have loved the use of Beyond the Sea during the final minutes of Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy [sic] if I had a clue as to what was going on.”  But he’s spot on with is assessment.  Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy is a muddled, boring mess that can’t be saved, no matter how many wonderful performances it has hidden within.

Comments

  1. agreed. well written review, exactly how i felt. oh well. (BTW, most of the other stuff BEE has tweeted i completely disagree with. Even a broken clock is right twice a day.)

  2. Well I was sitting right near Denise but artistic minds think alike – it was just too convoluted. I was telling a friend that if you don’t watch Smiley’s (Gary Oldman) glasses during the entire film, you’ll have no clue of when the story is switching to the past or referencing the present.

    Average performances all around, and I have seen much better out of Oldman than this – so this Awards buzz around him and the film is really throwing me (makes me think I missed something…but I know I didn’t).

    I should have known from the film distributor what this was and wasn’t. Not to say Focus features is a bad film house, just their productions tend to be more thought-laden and art-house destined flicks.

    Spot on review Denise – I’m glad we both saw the same thing.

  3. Rock — you’ve made me so happy! I’ve been feeling like I’m the only reviewer that gave this a big-ol’ thumbs down. Yeah, Focus tends to churn out navel-gazers. But even though I’d anticipated that, I hadn’t anticipated how mediocre this film would be.

    I like your glasses tip, wish I’d picked up on that. But I was too busy yawning….

  4. Just watched this on Netflix. In a word BO-RING! I disagree with just about everything most reviewers have said. It was a confusing mess. Screenplay very poorly done. Acting barely passable. I didn’t care a bit about who did what and why. A shame since Gary Oldman is an excellent actor but there wasn’t a bit of good acting on his part. Even the soundtrack and musical selections were awful. To be fair, I fell asleep twice so I may have missed something important. But I don’t think so. And I am NOT a fan of action movies and car chases.

    • Linda, I was quite literally pinching myself through the film so I wouldn’t nod off! And don’t worry, you missed nothing.

      If I hadn’t been in the theater as a critic, I’d have walked out. Getting sleepy just thinking about this clunker. At least you got some shut-eye! 🙂

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *